IBM®
Skip to main content
    Country/region [change]    Terms of use
 
 
 
    Home    Products    Services & solutions    Support & downloads    My account    

IBM Systems Journal
Accessibility   Volume 44, Number 3, 2005
Table of contents: HTMLPDF This article: HTMLPDF   Copyright info

A proposed architecture for integrating accessibility test tools - References

 by P. Englefield,
C. Paddison,
M. Tibbits,
and I. Damani
Cited references and notes

  1. Universal Usability Guide, universalusability.org, http://www.universalusability.org/.
  2. B. Shneiderman, “Universal Usability,” Communications of the ACM 43, No. 5, 84–91 (2000).
  3. The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People, Disability Rights Commission (2004), http://www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/report.asp.
  4. W. Chisholm, G. Vanderheiden, and I. Jacobs, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, World Wide Web Consortium (May 5, 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.
  5. Speech and Braille Output Software, Royal National Institute of the Blind, http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/PublicWebsite/public_speechbrailleoutput.hcsp.
  6. IBM Home Page Reader 3.04, IBM Corporation, http://www-3.ibm.com/able/solution_offerings/hpr.html.
  7. Welcome to TechDis, TechDis, http://www.techdis.ac.uk/index.php.
  8. Screen Magnification Software, Royal National Institute of the Blind, http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/PublicWebsite/public_screenmagnification.hcsp.
  9. Section 508: Glossary, NASA, http://section508.nasa.gov/glossary.htm.
  10. User Engineering, IBM Corporation, http://www-306.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/publish/1996.
  11. A. H. Maslow, Toward a Psychology of Being, 3rd Edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (1998).
  12. K. Norman, The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control at the Human/Computer Interface, Intellect Ltd., Bristol, UK (1991).
  13. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA (1994).
  14. H. W. J. Rittel, “Second Generation Design Methods,” , Interview in Design Methods Group 5th Anniversary Report: DMG Occasional Paper 1, 5–10 (1972). Reprinted in Developments in Design Methodology, N. Cross, Editor, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (1984), pp. 317–327.
  15. Professional discussion with blind colleague (2003).
  16. Disability Briefing December 2004, Disability Rights Commission (2004), http://www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/campaigndetails.asp?section=ddb&id=666.
  17. Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Disability Unit of the Department for Work and Pensions, UK, http://www.disability.gov.uk/dda/.
  18. Section 508, Center for IT Accommodation (CITA), Office of Governmentwide Policy, U.S. General Services Administration, http://www.section508.gov/.
  19. K. Vredenburg, User-Centered Design: The Integrated Approach, Prentice Hall, New York (2002).
  20. J. S. Dumas and J. C. Redish, A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, Intellect Ltd., Bristol, UK (1999).
  21. P. Englefield, A Pragmatic Framework for Selecting Empirical or Inspection Methods to Evaluate Usability, IBM Corporation (2003), http://www-306.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/Publish/50?OpenDocument&../ Publish/1118/$File/paper1118.pdf.
  22. J. West, “The Newest AT Goes Mainstream and to the Movies: Academy Awards Party Features Innovative Access for All Courtesy of IBM,” The Assistive Technology Journal 70, (April 2003), http://www.atnet.org/news/2003/apr03/040102.htm.
  23. Testing for Accessibility, Royal National Institute of the Blind, http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/publicWebsite/public_testing.hcsp#P27_2586.
  24. Local Authority Websites (LAWs), UK National Projects Programme, http://www.laws-project.org.uk.
  25. IBM Web Services, IBM Corporation, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/w-int.html.
  26. The Eclipse Project, The Eclipse Foundation, http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/.
  27. B. S. Rubin, A. R. Christ, and K. A. Bohrer, “Java and the IBM San Francisco Project,” IBM Systems Journal 37, No. 3, 365–371 (1998).
  28. E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition, Free Press, New York (2003).
  29. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/WAI/.
  30. Lynx, http://lynx.browser.org/.
  31. J. Knight, Attitudes to Web Accessibility, UsabilityNews.com (October 2003), http://www.usabilitynews.com/news/article1321.asp.
  32. Inspect32 and AccExplorer32 are both part of the Microsoft Active Accessibility® 2.0 Software Development Kit. For details, see Active Accessibility 2.0 SDK Tools, Microsoft Corporation, http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3755582A-A707-460A-BF21-1373316E13F0&displaylang=en.
  33. D. J. Delorie, Lynx Viewer, http://www.delorie.com/web/lynxview.html.
  34. LIFT Online, UsableNet Inc., http://www.usablenet.com/products_services/lift_online/lift_online.html.
  35. LIFT Machine, UsableNet Inc., http://www.usablenet.com/products_services/lift_machine/lift_machine.html.
  36. ISO Standard 9241: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (1999).
  37. S. Z. Nagi, “Disability Concepts Revisited: Implications for Prevention,” in Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention, A. M. Pope and A. R. Tarlov, Editors, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C (1991), pp. 309–327.
  38. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2001), http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm?myurl=introduction.html%20&mytitle=Introduction.
  39. Royal National Institute of the Blind, http://www.rnib.org.uk.
  40. W. Chisholm and S. B. Palmer, Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0, World Wide Web Consortium (December 6, 2002), http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-EARL10-20021206/.


    About IBM    Privacy    Contact