IBM Skip to main content
  Home     Products & services     Support & downloads     My account  
  Select a country  
Journals Home  
  Systems Journal  
  ·  Current Issue  
  ·  Recent Issues  
  ·  Papers in Progress  
  ·  Search/Index  
  ·  Orders  
  ·  Description  
  ·  Author's Guide  
Journal of Research
and Development
  Staff  
  Contact Us  
Systems Journal  
Volume 39, Numbers 3 & 4, 2000
MIT Media Laboratory
 Table of contents: arrowHTML arrowPDF arrowASCII   This article: arrowHTML arrowPDF arrowASCII
arrowCopyright info
   

Justifying imagery: Multimedia support for learning through explanation - References

by B. K. Smith and E. Blankinship

Cited references

  1. S. Carey and C. Smith, “On Understanding the Nature of Scientific Knowledge,” Software Goes to School: Teaching for Understanding with New Technologies, D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, and M. S. Wiske, Editors, Oxford University Press, New York (1995), pp. 39­55.
  2. N. G. Lederman, “Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 331­359 (1992).
  3. N. B. Songer and M. C. Linn, “How Do Students' Views of Science Influence Knowledge Integration?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 761­784 (1991).
  4. A. N. Whitehead, The Aims of Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1929).
  5. P. J. Germann, S. Haskins, and S. Auls, “Analysis of High School Biology Laboratory Manuals: Promoting Scientific Inquiry,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33, No. 5, 475­500 (1996).
  6. E. L. Pizzini, D. P. Shepardson, and S. K. Abell, “The Inquiry Level of Junior High Activities: Implications to Science Teaching,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, No. 2, 111­121 (1991).
  7. L. Schauble, R. Glaser, R. A. Duschl, S. Schulze, and J. John, “Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, No. 2, 131­166 (1995).
  8. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Science for All Americans: Project 2061, Oxford University Press, New York (1990).
  9. Developing Biological Literacy: A Guide to Secondary and Post-Secondary Biology Curricula, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Colorado Springs, CO (1993).
  10. National Research Council, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1996).
  11. M. C. Linn, A. diSessa, R. D. Pea, and N. B. Songer, “Can Research on Science Learning and Instruction Inform Standards for Science Education?” Journal of Science Education and Technology 3, No. 1, 7­15 (1994).
  12. S. Carey, R. Evans, M. Honda, E. Jay, and C. M. Unger, “‘An Experiment Is When You Try It and See If It Works’: A Study of Grade 7 Students' Understanding of the Construction of Scientific Knowledge,” International Journal of Science Education 11, 514­529 (1989).
  13. D. Klahr and K. Dunbar, “Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning,” Cognitive Science 12, No. 1, 1­48 (1988).
  14. D. Kuhn, L. Schauble, and M. Garcia-Mila, “Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning,” Cognition and Instruction 9, No. 4, 285­327 (1992).
  15. L. Schauble and R. Glaser, “Scientific Thinking in Children and Adults,” Developmental Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Thinking Skills: Contributions to Human Development 21, 9­27 (1990).
  16. J. D. Bransford, R. D. Sherwood, T. S. Hasselbring, C. K. Kinzer, and S. M. Williams, “Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology Can Help,” Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology, D. Nix and R. Spiro, Editors, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1990), pp. 115­141.
  17. A. Collins and J. S. Brown, “The Computer as a Tool for Learning Through Reflection,” Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, H. Mandl and A. Lesgold, Editors, Springer-Verlag, New York (1998), pp. 1­18.
  18. C. D. Wetzel, P. H. Radtke, and H. W. Stern, Instructional Effectiveness of Video Media, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1994).
  19. J. D. Bransford and B. S. Stein, The Ideal Problem Solver: A Guide for Improving Thinking, Learning, and Creativity, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1993).
  20. E. Ellsworth, “Educational Films Against Critical Pedagogy,” The Ideology of Images in Educational Media: Hidden Curriculums in the Classroom, E. Ellsworth and M. H. Whatley, Editors, Teachers College Press, New York (1990), pp. 10­26.
  21. B. Erdman, “The Closely Guided Viewer: Form, Style, and Teaching in the Educational Film,” The Ideology of Images in Educational Media: Hidden Curriculums in the Classroom, E. Ellsworth and M. H. Whatley, Editors, Teachers College Press, New York (1990), pp. 27­42.
  22. Visual Education Curriculum Project, Pictures of Ideas: Learning Through Visual Comparison and Analogy, Curriculum Development Centre, Canberra, Australia (1981).
  23. B. W. Fredette, “Use of Visuals in Schools (Curriculum and Instruction),” Visual Literacy: A Spectrum of Visual Learning, D. M. Moore and F. M. Dwyer, Editors, Educational Technology Publications, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1994), pp. 235­256.
  24. S. Ohlsson, “The Cognitive Skill of Theory Articulation: A Neglected Aspect of Science Education?” Science & Education 1, No. 2, 181­192 (1992).
  25. M. Cappo and K. Darling, “Measurement in Motion,” Communications of the ACM 39, No. 8, 91­93 (1996).
  26. A. Rubin and D. Win, “Studying Motion with KidVid: A Data Collection and Analysis Tool for Digitized Video,” Conference Companion to CHI '94, ACM Press, New York (1994), pp. 13­14.
  27. A. Rubin, S. Bresnahan, and T. Ducas, “Cartwheeling Through CamMotion,” Communications of the ACM 39, No. 8, 84­85 (1996).
  28. M. M. Gross, “Analysis of Human Movement Using Digital Video,” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7, No. 4, 375­395 (1998).
  29. B. J. S. Barron, D. L. Schwartz, N. J. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech, J. D. Bransford, and Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, “Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 7, Nos. 3 & 4, 271­311 (1998).
  30. B. A. Nardi, A. Kuchinsky, S. Whittaker, R. Leichner, and H. Schwarz, “Video-as-Data: Technical and Social Aspects of a Collaborative Multimedia Application,” Computer Supported Collaborative Work 4, 73­100 (1996).
  31. R. Goldman-Segall, Points of Viewing Children's Thinking: A Digital Ethnographer's Journey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1997).
  32. T. Chaney-Cullen and T. M. Duffy, “Strategic Teaching Framework: Multimedia to Support Teacher Change,” Journal of the Learning Sciences 8, No. 1, 1­40 (1999).
  33. M. Lampert and D. L. Ball, Teaching, Multimedia, and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice, Teachers College Press, New York (1998).
  34. E. Soloway, J. S. Krajcik, P. Blumenfeld, and R. Marx, “Technological Support for Teachers Transitioning to Project-Based Science Practices,” CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, T. Koschmann, Editor, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1996), pp. 269­305.
  35. I. Tabak, B. K. Smith, W. A. Sandoval, and B. J. Reiser, “Combining General and Domain-Specific Strategic Support for Biological Inquiry,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, London (1996), pp. 288­296.
  36. D. C. Merrill, B. J. Reiser, R. Beekelaar, and A. Hamid, “Making Processes Visible: Scaffolding Learning with Reasoning-Congruent Representations,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, and I. McCalla, Editors, Springer-Verlag, New York (1992), pp. 103­110.
  37. B. Y. White, “ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education,” Cognition and Instruction 10, 1­100 (1993).
  38. J. Klayman and Y.-W. Ha, “Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Information in Hypothesis Testing,” Psychological Review 94, 211­228 (1987).
  39. B. K. Smith and B. J. Reiser, “What Should a Wildebeest Say? Interactive Nature Films for High School Classrooms,” ACM Multimedia '97 Proceedings, ACM Press, New York (1997), pp. 193­201.
  40. B. K. Smith and B. J. Reiser, “National Geographic Unplugged: Classroom-Centered Design of Interactive Nature Films,” Proceedings of the CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York (1998), pp. 424­431.
  41. B. C. R. Bertram, “Serengeti Predators and Their Social Systems,” Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem, A. R. E. Sinclair and M. Norton-Griffiths, Editors, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1979), pp. 223­248.
  42. G. B. Schaller, The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1972).
  43. R. J. Paxton, “A Deafening Silence: History Textbooks and the Students Who Read Them,” Review of Educational Research 69, No. 3, 315­339 (1999).
  44. J.-F. Rouet, M. Favart, M. A. Britt, and C. A. Perfetti, “Studying and Using Multiple Documents in History: Effects of Discipline Expertise,” Cognition and Instruction 15, No. 1, 85­106 (1997).
  45. S. S. Wineburg, “Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence,” Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 73­87 (1991).
  46. J. R. Stilgoe, Outside Lies Magic: Regaining History and Awareness in Everyday Places, Walker and Company, New York (1998).
  47. M.-J. Kraak, “Integrating Multimedia in Geographical Information Systems,” IEEE Multimedia 3, No. 2, 59­65 (1996).
  48. J. Spohrer, Worldboard: What Comes After the WWW? http://www.worldboard.org/pub/spohrer/wbconcept/default.html.
  49. C. Tsui, Multimedia Data Integration and Retrieval in Planning Support Systems, M.S. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA (1998).
  50. C. Alexander, S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein, A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1977).
  51. T. Brinck and L. M. Gomez, “A Collaborative Medium for the Support of Conversational Props,” Conference Proceedings on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work, ACM Press, New York (1992), pp. 171­178.
  52. J. Roschelle, “Learning by Collaboration: Convergent Conceptual Change,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2, 235­276 (1992).
  53. J. P. Elliott, I. M. Cowan, and C. S. Holling, “Prey Capture by the African Lion,” Canadian Journal of Zoology 55, 1811­1828 (1977).
  54. S. L. Lima, “Vigilance While Feeding and Its Relation to the Risk of Predation,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 124, 303­316 (1987).
  55. S. L. Lima and L. M. Dill, “Behavioral Decisions Made Under the Risk of Predation: A Review and Prospectus,” Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619­640 (1990).
  56. L. D. Mech, The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species, Natural History Press, Garden City, NY (1970).
  57. D. Scheel, “Waiting for Lions in the Grass: The Usefulness of Scanning and Its Effects During Hunts,” Animal Behaviour 46, 695­704 (1993).
  58. B. K. Smith, Classroom Cinema: Explaining Behavior with Video, Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1998).
  59. D. D. Suthers, “Effects of Alternate Representations of Evidential Relations on Collaborative Learning Discourse,” Proceedings of the Third Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Palo Alto, CA (December 11­15, 1999).
  60. L. Grosslight, C. Unger, E. Jay, and C. L. Smith, “Understanding Models and Their Use in Science: Conceptions of Middle and High School Students and Experts,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, No. 9, 799­822 (1991).

About IBM | Privacy | Legal | Contact