|
1. Introduction
While " pure'' SiO2 films remained the principal material for gate dielectrics in MIS-based structures for more than three decades, the use of the traditional SiO2 gate dielectric has become questionable for sub-0.25-µm ULSI devices [1-5]. Increasing problems with dopant (boron) penetration through ultrathin SiO2 layers and direct tunneling for ultrathin (<2 nm) oxide films dictate the search for and aggressive exploration of new materials for future gate dielectric applications with better diffusion barrier properties and higher dielectric constants [6, 7]. At this time, ultrathin silicon oxynitrides (SiOxNy or, more accurately, nitrogen-doped SiO2) are the leading candidates to replace pure SiO2 [8-24]. Oxynitrides exhibit several properties superior to those of conventional thermal O2 oxides (SiO2), the more important being suppression of boron penetration from the poly-Si gate and enhanced reliability. Nitrogen also reduces hot-electron-induced degradation [25]. The dielectric constant of the oxynitride increases linearly with the percentage of nitrogen from (SiO2) = 3.8 to (Si3N4) = 7.8 [26, 27], though one should note that most SiOxNy films grown currently by thermal methods are lightly " doped'' with N (<10 at.%) and therefore have a dielectric constant only slightly higher than that of pure SiO2.
Recent publications suggest that the performance of CMOS-based devices depends on both the concentration and distribution of the nitrogen atoms incorporated into the gate dielectric [14, 16, 18, 28-30]. For example, excessive nitrogen at the interface may reduce peak carrier mobility in the channel of MOSFETs and may allow boron accumulation in the oxide, which, in turn, may result in device instabilities [28]. The optimal nitrogen profile is determined by its specific application, although our incomplete understanding of the atomic-scale structural and electronic properties of dielectrics makes the desired structure an imperfectly defined goal. One possibility is an SiOxNy film with two nitrogen-enhanced layers: first, nitrogen at or near the Si/SiO2 interface to improve hot-electron immunity, and second, an even higher nitrogen concentration at the SiO2/polysilicon interface, as this is where it can best be used to minimize the penetration of boron from the heavily doped gate electrode [29]. The boron flux can be quite large (depending upon the thermal budget) and, therefore, higher nitrogen concentrations at the poly-Si interface are needed [28]. Although the actual " ideal'' amounts of nitrogen required at each interface are not known, typical interfacial contents are of the order of (0.5-1) x 1015 cm-2 near each interface. The best methods to produce the desired ultrathin SiOxNy films are still under debate.
Nitrogen may be incorporated into SiO2 using either thermal oxidation/annealing [8, 9, 12-14, 31-39] or chemical and physical deposition 15, 16, 18, 19, 40, 41] methods (Figure 1). Thermal nitridation of SiO2 in NO or N2O generally results in a relatively low concentration of nitrogen in the films, of the order of 1015 N/cm2 [20, 29, 33, 42]. Since nitrogen content increases with temperature, thermal oxynitridation is typically performed at high temperatures, i.e., >800°C [20, 29, 33, 42]. For more heavily N-doped SiOxNy films, other deposition methods, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [40] with different precursors and its low-pressure (LP) and/or rapid thermal (RT) variants [18], jet vapor deposition (JVD) [43], atomic layer deposition (ALD) [44], or nitridation by energetic nitrogen particles (plasma, N atoms, or ions) [45-55], can be used. These nitridation methods can be performed at lower temperatures, ~300-400°C. However, low-temperature deposition methods may result in nonequilibrium films, and subsequent thermal processing steps are often required to improve film quality and minimize defects and induced damage [19, 56]. Because the thermodynamics [57, 58] of the SiOxNy system and the kinetics [12, 20, 29, 32, 38, 59-63] of nitrogen incorporation are rather complex, these different methods produce oxynitride films with different total nitrogen concentrations and depth distributions. From a scientific viewpoint, the addition of N into the Si-O system opens a number of questions concerning microstructure, defects, and growth mechanisms, issues which are still under intense debate even for the much simpler " pure'' SiO2/Si system [64-71].
Figure 1
Characterizing the nitrogen distribution in ultrathin films with the required sub-nm accuracy is an analytical challenge. Conventional depth profiling approaches, such as SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) [9, 14, 18, 34, 72] and HF etch-back methods [12, 33, 35] [in combination with XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), NRA (nuclear reaction analysis), etc.], offer limited depth resolution, especially for ultrathin dielectrics. In addition, SIMS analysis is complicated by matrix effects [73], while HF etching may introduce nonuniform oxide removal (especially in the presence of local nitrogen-rich regions) and other deleterious chemical effects. We have recently demonstrated [62, 63, 74-76] that high-resolution ( E/E 0.1%) medium-energy ion scattering (MEIS) [77] is a useful technique for accurately obtaining the depth distribution profile of nitrogen in 1-4-nm oxynitride films with sub-nm accuracy.
In this paper, we review our recent progress in 1) characterizing nitrogen depth profiles (by MEIS [42, 74, 76]) and bonding (by XPS [78]) of ultrathin SiOxNy films, and 2) understanding the mechanisms of nitrogen incorporation into ultrathin oxide films [42, 62, 63, 79, 80]. We demonstrate how this basic knowledge can be used to guide nitrogen nanoengineering technology, in particular to produce layered nitrogen structures [81]. A significant part of the paper is devoted to thermal oxynitridation of Si in NO and N2O. Other nitridation methods are also briefly discussed.
2. Thermodynamics of the Si-N-O system
The bulk phase diagram of the Si-N-O system is shown in Figure 2. The diagram consists of four phases: Si, SiO2 (cristobolite, tridymite), Si3N4, and Si2N2O [57, 58]. The three compound phases have similar structural units: SiO4 tetrahedra for SiO2, SiN4 tetrahedra for Si3N4, and slightly distorted SiN3O tetrahedra for Si2N2O, implying that the phases can be converted from SiO2 to Si2N2O and finally to Si3N4 by replacing oxygen with nitrogen. However, the nitride (Si3N4) and the oxide (SiO2) phases never coexist in the bulk under equilibrium conditions. They are always separated by the oxynitride (Si2N2O), which is the only thermodynamically stable and crystalline form of silicon oxynitride.
Figure 2
A puzzling question is why nitrogen atoms are incorporated at all in SiO2. According to thermodynamic equilibrium, nitrogen should not incorporate into an SiO2 film that is grown on Si in almost any partial pressure of oxygen, i.e., >10-17 atm, depending upon temperature [57, 58]. One can see from Figure 2 that the Si2N2O/SiO2 phase boundary exists at about 10-18 atm for T = 1400 K. At any oxygen partial pressure greater than that, which surely exists in a furnace or rapid thermal processing (RTP) reactor or, for example, during N2O or NO decomposition at high temperatures, only SiO2 phases (crystalline or amorphous) should form. Therefore, nitrogen in bulk SiO2 is not thermodynamically stable.
At least two reasons for the presence of nitrogen in the SiO2 film can be suggested. First, nitrogen atoms may simply be kinetically trapped at the reaction zone near the interface (i.e., the nitrogen is present in a nonequilibrium state, where the rate of the transition to equilibrium is slow and some N is trapped) or by structural defects in the SiO2 film [82]. The basic idea in this model is that nitrogen brought into the film during oxynitridation (as, for example, NO; see below) reacts only with Si-Si bonds at or near the interface, not with Si-O bonds in the bulk of the SiO2 overlayer. Alternatively, the nitrogen at the interface may indeed be thermodynamically stable due to the presence of free-energy terms that are not yet understood. For example, nitrogen may lower the interfacial strain known to exist at the SiO2/Si interface. This could explain why incorporated nitrogen (especially in N2O or NO oxides) is often associated with the Si/SiO2 interface, consistent with a special, stabilizing role of the nitrogen at the interface. Even when nitrogen is implanted into Si, it tends to migrate to the Si/SiO2 interface during oxidation and be incorporated in the SiO2 [83, 84]. Therefore, there is some evidence that the nitrogen plays a specific role at the interface, but also that it is not stable away from it. On the other hand, nonequilibrium techniques (for example, plasma nitridation) have yielded oxynitrides with much higher concentrations of incorporated nitrogen (including top-surface nitridation [49]) than thermal oxynitridation methods (e.g., in NO, N2O, N2). This fact seems to be supportive of the " kinetic trapping'' concept. Finally, we note that the favorable thermodynamics of the SiO2 phase discussed above may be the reason why Si3N4 films (produced by JVD or other methods) always contain some oxygen; of course, contamination by H2O, O2, etc. with a high sticking coefficient would also result in mixed oxide-nitride phases.
3. Diffusion-barrier properties of nitrided layers
An important property of nitrogen in nitrided oxides is that it forms a barrier against the diffusion of boron. Concurrent with this, it also lowers the diffusion rates for oxygen, nitric oxide, and other dopants, significantly slowing the rate of further oxidation or nitridation [21, 32, 34, 63, 82, 85-90]. For example, for a 2-nm oxynitride with ~1 ML (monolayer) of nitrogen (6.8 x 1014 N/cm2) located near the interface, the rate of continued oxidation at 900°C decreases by at least a factor of 4 relative to the pure oxide. A reasonable argument can be made that the decrease in film growth rate (due to nitrogen) results from a decreased rate of diffusion. The density of nitrides and oxynitrides is higher than that of the pure oxide [40]; thus, the diffusivity of NO, O2, N2, or other nonreactive molecular species such as noble gases should be lower in the nitrogen-containing films. However, another property involving N bonds may be equally important: The lattice itself may become more rigid on an atomic level. The three bonds connected to each nitrogen (as in Si3N4) are more constrained than the two bonds of each O atom in SiO2, where the Si-O-Si bond angles can go from 120° to 180° with little change in energy; this may also contribute to a decrease in the ability of the nitrided lattice to permit diffusion of atoms and small molecules. The latter argument is valid for either an interstitial diffusion mode (of molecules), or an exchange-hopping substitutional mode (of excess atoms).
By analogy, both physical (e.g., density) and chemical arguments have been used to explain the important effect of the reduced penetration rate of boron from the poly-Si gate into nitrided oxides. (Boron penetration causes threshold voltage shifts and degrades reliability.) To explain the " stopping power'' of the nitrogen in oxides, a model assuming boron diffusion via peroxy linkage defects (Si-O-O-Si bonds), whose concentration changes under different processing conditions and film thicknesses, has been suggested [91]. For a 1.5-nm SiO2 film, the diffusivity at 900°C would increase by a factor of 24 as compared with 10-nm oxides. According to this model, the role of nitrogen is that the N atoms compete with B for occupation of the defect sites. The model was criticized by Ellis and Buhrman [92], who argued that 1) Si-O-N-O-Si structures, which should form after N passivation, are not observed in XPS; and 2) according to percolation theory, to fit the experimental data the peroxy defects should have an unreasonably high concentration (~40% of the Si-O-Si bonds). Ellis and Buhrman developed a model in which boron diffuses substitutionally for Si atoms, and the role of the Si-N bond is to impede substitution for that Si atom [92]. The model was incorporated into a Monte Carlo simulation and showed good agreement with experimental data.
Another interesting aspect of the diffusion barrier property of nitrided layers is that silicon interstitials generated during the film growth reaction at the interface are blocked from diffusing into the oxide [93]. This results in an enhanced flux of the interstitials into the Si substrate, which in turn yields an increased density of oxidation stacking faults and may also affect oxidation-induced diffusion [93]. Finally, we note that other chemistries may play an important role both in film growth processes and in the more technically important issue, electrical defects that occur in the final devices. Hydrogen, water, and various other species quite possibly exist at finite concentrations [94]. For example, both fluorine and hydrogen enhance the boron diffusion rate [91]. Hydrogen may also play an important role in the diffusion/reaction processes during (oxy)nitride formation [40].
4. Materials characterization of ultrathin nitrided oxides
Two major problems in measuring nitrogen in SiOxNy films are the following: 1) In many cases the concentration of nitrogen in the film is rather low (as an example, in earlier studies of NO oxynitrides [95] it was claimed that the films are essentially SiO2 because the nitrogen was undetectable at that time); and 2) the films in question are very thin (<5 nm), suggesting that sub-nm depth resolution is required to monitor nitrogen depth profiles. Over the past few years, several techniques, such as secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) [18, 34, 72, 73, 78], nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) [29, , 33, 38, 59, 80, 96, 97], medium-energy ion scattering (MEIS) [39, 42, 62, 63, 74-76, 80], X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [12, 30, 34, 35, 37, 48, 74, 48, 87, 98-101], Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) [19], Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [102], spectroscopic ellipsometry [103], and others have been utilized to study nitrogen concentrations, depth profiles, nitrogen bonding, and microstructure of oxynitrided films. Below we outline the features and the utility of these techniques for ultrathin oxynitride studies.
SIMS, a standard technique used in the industry to monitor concentration profiles in semiconductor structures, was one of the first methods applied to the nitrogen depth distribution problem in oxynitrided films. The technique has a rather high sensitivity (of the order of 0.001 at.%), can be performed rapidly, and shows good long-term reproducibility [73]. As an example, Figure 3 illustrates nitrogen depth profiles for ~5-nm oxynitride films grown by thermal oxynitridation of Si(100) in N2O (both in a furnace and in an RTP reactor), and in O2 followed by NO [74]. One can see different depth profiles depending on the processing conditions. The NO-annealed film has the highest concentration of nitrogen incorporated near the SiOxNy/Si interface. The RTN2O (rapid thermal oxynitridation) film also shows nitrogen located near the interface, whereas the furnace-grown film has a broader nitrogen depth distribution. Both N2O oxynitrides have nitrogen concentrations lower than the NO-annealed film. The technique begins to reach the limits of depth resolution (estimated to be ~2-3 nm) for sub-5-nm films. Another more important complication for SIMS analysis are " matrix effects,'' in which the sputtered nitrogen ion yield depends strongly on the local film chemistry around the nitrogen. For example, the (CsN+) ion yield from nitrogen in bulk Si is about six times smaller than in SiO2, while that for N near the interface is about three times that observed in the bulk of the SiO2 film [73]. The use of CsN+ ions as the detected species seems to minimize the matrix effect, since for negative ions matrix effects are even more severe. In most cases, SIMS analysis is also complicated by surface contamination and initial sputtering effects which make measurements of the nitrogen in the top (~1 nm) surface layers not very meaningful. Finally, one more metrological aspect of the SIMS analysis is that the N concentration shown for the interface peak (see Figure 3) may not be accurate due to ion mixing. The areal density of the N peak should be used instead. Reference samples (especially with different nitrogen distributions) calibrated by other quantitative methods (NRA, MEIS, etc.) may be helpful for more accurate quantitative SIMS analysis.
Figure 3
NRA analysis of oxynitrides is based on the detection of protons, -particles, and -rays generated in nuclear reactions of nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and hydrogen (deuterium) induced by high-energy charged particles (Table 1) [29, 32, 33, 38, 59, 80, 96, 97]. The cross sections for these reactions can be determined in independent calibration experiments, and the signal-to-background ratio is in many cases quite favorable. Since the nuclear reaction rates are sensitive only to the number of nuclei in the films, the technique yields absolute concentrations of the species investigated. In particular, the technique allows one to determine the absolute concentration of 14N with an accuracy of ~7-10% and a detection limit of ~5 x 1013 atoms/cm2 via the reaction of 14N(d, 0,1)12C induced by 1.1-MeV deuterons. Figure 4 shows the nitrogen content (which is an increasing function of temperature) in oxynitride films grown by rapid thermal oxynitridation in N2O [33]. The oxygen content in the films can also be measured by NRA, for example by the 16O(d, p)17O reaction at 850 keV. This allows one to calculate the thickness of the films (provided that film density is known). An additional advantage of the NRA technique is the detection of nitrogen (15N) and oxygen (18O) isotopes with the help of the following reactions: 15N(p, )12C at 1000 keV, 18O(p, )15N at 730 keV, and the resonant reactions of 15N(p, )12C at 429 keV and 18O(p, )15N at 151 keV. Isotopic labeling has been proven to be a useful method to study mechanistic aspects (including nitrogen and oxygen transport) of silicon (oxy)nitridation [38, 59, 97, 104]. Owing to the narrow resonances (with widths of 120 and 100 eV, respectively), the latter two reactions can be used for depth profiling of 15N and 18O on an approximately 1-nm scale under favorable conditions. Depth profiling can also be performed by an HF acid etch-back with subsequent NRA measurement of N remaining in the film [13]. One more useful application of NRA is based on its ability to measure hydrogen/deuterium [H(15N,  )12C at 429 keV and D(3He, p)4He at 700 keV] since H/D is believed to be important in both the nitridation mechanism and device performance [105, 106]. Finally, we note that nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and hydrogen can also be monitored by the technique of elastic recoil detection (ERD) of primary MeV ions [86].
Figure 4
|
Table 1 Selected nuclear reactions for oxynitride characterization.
|
|
Target element
|
Nuclear reaction
|
Energy (keV)
|
Sensitivity (atoms/cm2)
|
| |
H
|
H(15N,  )12C
|
6420
|
~1014
|
|
|
D
|
D(3He, p)4He
|
700
|
~1012
|
|
14N
|
14N(d, 0,1)12C
|
1100
|
~5 x 1013
|
|
15N
|
15N(p, )12C
|
1000
|
~1012
|
|
15N
|
15N(p,  )12C
|
429
|
~1013
(estimated)
|
|
16O
|
16O(d, p)17O
|
850
|
~1014
|
|
18O
|
18O(p, )15N
|
730
|
~1012
|
|
18O
|
18O(p, )15N
|
151
|
~1013
(estimated)
|
|
28Si
|
28Si(p, )29P
|
371
|
|
29Si
|
29Si(p, )30P
|
324
417
|
~1013
(estimated)
|
|
30Si
|
30Si(p, )31P
|
499
|
~1013
(estimated)
|
|
MEIS, another ion beam technique, is based on the same principles of ion-solid interactions as is conventional Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS) [77]. Because of the lower ion energy used in MEIS (typically 100 keV, at which the energy loss of protons in a solid is maximal), and the use of a high-resolution toroidal electrostatic ion energy analyzer [107] ( E/E 0.1%), almost-monolayer depth resolution can be obtained [108, 109]. We have demonstrated that a 0.3-0.5-nm accuracy (near the top surface or for very thin films) in the nitrogen depth profiles can be achieved [42, 74]. To our knowledge, this is the best depth resolution for nitrogen in SiOxNy films achieved so far. However, due to the statistical nature of the ion energy loss in the solid (straggling effect) [110], the resolution decreases with increasing distance from the surface. MEIS allows one to monitor simultaneously both absolute concentrations and depth profiles of N, O, and Si in the film. The detection limit of nitrogen in SiO2 is about 2-3 x 1014 atoms/cm2, depending on the film thickness and the width of the nitrogen distribution in the film. It is worth noting that, in opposition to other depth-profiling techniques (e.g., SIMS), both the sensitivity to nitrogen and the depth resolution increase with decreasing dielectric film thickness. Another strength of MEIS is mass sensitivity, which enables isotopic (18O and 16O) labeling experiments [111, 112]. Light elements (for example, hydrogen and boron) can also be detected in the elastic recoil configuration, as demonstrated by Copel and Tromp [113, 114].
Figure 5(a) shows a typical MEIS spectrum for an SiO2 film annealed in NO. Three peaks are seen in this spectrum, corresponding to nitrogen, oxygen, and silicon. The lighter mass (nitrogen) yields a peak at lower energy, as given by classical two-body scattering kinematics [77]. The areas under the peaks (after corrections for the known cross sections) are proportional to the total amounts of oxygen and nitrogen in the film [77]. Obviously, the amount of nitrogen is much smaller than that of oxygen. The shape of the nitrogen peak is determined by the depth distribution of nitrogen in the film. Because of energy loss arising from electronic excitations, protons backscattered from nitrogen atoms closer to the Si-SiOxNy interface have lower energy than those scattered off the atoms near the surface. Accurate depth distributions [Figure 5(b)] of Si, O, and N are deduced from simulations of energy spectra, as discussed in [111]. More details about the MEIS setup, data acquisition and analysis, and the isotopic labeling technique can be found elsewhere [74, 108, 111, 112, 115-117].
Figure 5
The above ion beam methods are unfortunately not capable of examining local nitrogen bonding in (oxy)nitrided films. Photoemission (XPS) is a common technique used to help determine local bonding configurations of atoms on a surface or in a thin film [68, 118-121]. XPS analysis is based on the fact that the energies of the electronic core levels are altered by the local electronic configurations. The observed energy levels shift with changing local chemical environment (the so-called chemical shifts). Early XPS studies were limited to the detection of nitrogen at the interface of SiO2 annealed in nitrogen [87, 98]. More recent high-resolution (including synchrotron-based) photoemission studies of core levels of nitrogen (N 1s) and silicon (Si 2p) atoms were useful in understanding nitrogen bonding and depth distribution (with HF etch-back or variable photoelectron takeoff angle methods) [35, 37, 78, 99, 122]. Depth analysis in XPS is determined by the escape depth of the N 1s or Si 2p photoelectrons, which are of the order of 2-3.5 nm for conventional AlK or MgK X-ray sources. N 1s spectra for NO and N2O oxynitrides are shown in Figure 6 [78]. The nitrogen spectrum for the N2O-grown film has much lower intensity than that of the NO oxynitride, which indicates that an NO source is more effective in terms of nitrogen incorporation into the dielectric film. A second feature to point out is that the spectra for both NO and N2O oxynitrides have similar shapes (see inset), suggesting that the local bonding configurations of nitrogen in the two films are similar.
Figure 6
A more detailed analysis of the N 1s peak shape shows that the peak is asymmetric and consists of at least two components [35, 78, 99]. The lower binding energy (BE) component at ~397.6 eV (calibrated with respect to the Si 2p peak at 99.2 eV) is located closer to the interface, while the higher BE component at 398.3-399.0 eV (the thicker the film, the higher the value) corresponds to nitrogen atoms located further into the overlayer film. The lower BE peak can be assigned to N atoms bonded to three Si atoms, as follows from the observation of an N 1s peak at ~397.6 eV from a reference Si3N4 film 35, 99]. The shift of the higher BE component originates from both electrostatic (charging, core hole screening) and structural effects. The structural effects may include different bond length and bond angles in the " bulk'' of the film and near the interface, strain near the interface, and/or second-neighbor effects (i.e., bonding/atoms in the shell of second neighbors near the interface may be different from those in the middle of the oxynitride film) [100]. N-O bonds are unlikely to be present at high concentration in the NO and N2O oxynitrides because the chemical shift of ~1.5 eV (relative to the N-Si bond) calculated recently [100] for this configuration is larger than any experimentally observed ones. Recent work by R. Opila and J. Chang demonstrated that nitrogen profiles obtained from angular resolved XPS were consistent with MEIS depth profiles. They also showed that for oxynitride films processed by plasma, metastable nitrogen states may be observed with binding energies greater than 400 eV. Finally, we note that XPS is also useful in obtaining film thickness [123] (from the ratio of Si 2p peaks corresponding to the film and Si substrate) and interface structure [30, 35, 68, 118, 121, 124] (from the concentration of Si1+, Si2+, and Si3+ suboxide states observed in the Si 2p spectrum). Recent XPS studies of the suboxide states in N2O oxynitrides were interpreted as giving evidence for a lower defect density at the SiOxNy/Si interface with respect to the SiO2/Si interface [35]. However, an opposite effect (i.e., an increased concentration of the Si1+ state and an unchanged concentration of the Si1+ and Si2+) has also been reported [30]. Another electron spectroscopy, AES, can also be used to measure nitrogen content in SiOxNy films and has been used effectively in studies of plasma-nitrided samples [19]. Though the AES sensitivity to nitrogen is similar to that of XPS, the interpretation of spectral features is usually more difficult than in XPS because the Auger electron emission process is more complex than photoemission.
Finally we discuss some other techniques for characterizing nitrogen and SiOxNy film microstructure. The amount of nitrogen can be crudely estimated from oxidation kinetics measurements. Since nitrogen significantly retards transport/reactions in (oxy)nitrided films [32, 34], this simple method can be used to monitor the presence of nitrogen in the film and to compare its relative value in different samples. However, the retardation rate depends not only on the N concentration but also on the depth distribution. A given amount of N evenly distributed in the film would produce a diffusion barrier quite different from one in which the nitrogen distribution is sharply peaked, making quantitative analysis difficult. Spectroscopic (immersion) ellipsometry results on N2O- and NO-grown oxynitrides show an agreement with SIMS measurements, though one should keep in mind that ellipsometric analysis is very dependent on parameters and models [103]. A structural two-layer model of N2O oxynitride films with an ~1.4-1.6-nm-thick Si2N2O phase near the interface was suggested to explain a shift of the main peak in the FTIR spectrum as a function of the thickness of the films [102]. Optical second-harmonic spectroscopy has been used to study strain at the interface [125, 126]. Roughness at the SiOxNy/Si interface was studied by X-ray diffraction. It was found that, for N2O oxynitrides, the (RMS) roughness is smaller than for pure SiO2 films and decreases with temperature [33].
5. Thermal (oxy)nitridation methods
Nitrogen incorporation into ultrathin dielectrics by NO processing
Oxidation of silicon and annealing of SiO2 in nitrous (N2O) or nitric (NO) oxides are the leading hydrogen- free processing methods for making nitrided oxides by conventional thermal routes [20, 21, 29]. Oxynitridation in N2O is particularly attractive because 1) it allows one to incorporate what appears to be an appropriate amount of nitrogen near the SiOxNy/Si interface (typically ~5 x 1014 atoms/cm2); and 2) its processing similarity to O2 permits N2O to replace oxygen in oxidation reactors/furnaces. However, among other factors, oxynitridation in N2O is complicated by the fast gas-phase decomposition of the molecule into N2, O2, NO, and O at typical oxidation temperatures, 800-1100°C (see the subsection on gas-phase N2O decomposition which follows). NO is now believed to be responsible for nitrogen incorporation into the film [21, 29, 31, 37, 60, 127, 128], suggesting that understanding oxynitridation in NO is a necessary step before considering more complex gases such as N2O. If NO is the main species responsible for nitrogen incorporation into the film, oxynitridation in pure NO should be considered for ultrathin dielectrics, especially in processes in which thermal budget and film thickness issues are crucial. Compared to N2O, oxynitridation in NO results in more nitrogen incorporation at equivalent temperatures [14, 34, 37, 74, 82]. In addition, NO oxynitrides exhibit lower leakage currents and interface defect densities, as well as improved electrical stress properties [14, 34]. However, channel mobility may be reduced if the nitrogen concentration near the interface is too high.
Figure 7 shows the total amounts of oxygen and nitrogen in ultrathin films on Si(100) after exposure in NO for an hour in the temperature range of 700-1000°C [42]. As the temperature increases, the total amounts of both nitrogen and oxygen increase. One should also note that the ratio of nitrogen to oxygen in the film increases with increasing temperature (increasing by ~50% from 700 to 1000°C). This was also observed during the initial stage of the interaction of NO with Si(111) at much lower pressure (10-6 Torr) [129]. In other words, the film becomes more nitride-like at higher temperatures. The fact that the concentration of nitrogen increases with temperature has an important implication for the (oxy)nitridation of silicon in N2O. It was observed that in the case of N2O, a higher (oxy)nitridation temperature also gives rise to a higher nitrogen content in the film (Figure 4); this was attributed to a higher percentage of NO in the product stream resulting from the N2O gas-phase decomposition at higher temperatures. Our results with NO as the only reactive gas clearly show that the solid-state chemistry is also important in the understanding of the incorporation and distribution of nitrogen in the dielectric layer.
Figure 7
Quantitative MEIS nitrogen depth profiles corresponding to NO oxynitrides grown at different temperatures are shown in Figure 8 [42]. The width of the nitrogen-containing region increases with temperature. As the position of the interface (deduced from the oxygen depth profile and marked by arrows) propagates deeper into the Si substrate with increasing temperature, the nitrogen follows the movement of the interface such that, for the samples we examined, the nitrogen is distributed almost evenly in the films (also observed in a recent XPS/Ar+ sputtering depth profiling study [37]), except for the very near-surface SiO2 region. These results are inconsistent with a model of a (continuous) single silicon nitride (Si3N4) layer near the interface. We further note that while recent SIMS results [34] on silicon (furnace) nitridation in NO were interpreted in terms of a nitrogen distribution sharply peaked on the substrate (silicon) side of the interface, rather than in the near-interfacial oxide, our MEIS studies did not find any evidence of significant nitrogen incorporation into the substrate. In addition, multiple features in angularly dependent core-level (N 1s and Si 2p) photoemission [34, 35, 74] and the multiphase nature of EPR signals from oxynitrides [130] suggest more complex (other than a single Si3N4 phase) local chemical bonding in the film.
Figure 8
Owing to the relatively high concentration of nitrogen incorporated into NO films, the kinetics of reoxynitridation are very slow. (The role of nitrogen in retarding the oxidation rate is discussed by us [32, 63] and by others [87, 88] elsewhere.) The thicknesses of the films after clean silicon surface exposure at 700-1000°C for one hour were only ~1.5-2.5 nm (Figure 8), consistent with earlier kinetic studies [95]. From a practical viewpoint, the slower growth of the oxynitride compared to a pure oxide facilitates good thickness control in the ultrathin regime during high-temperature processing. To make a thicker film, a thin preoxide (SiO2) of desired thickness can first be formed, followed by an NO anneal. Typically NO-annealed preoxides yield nitrogen distributions different from the NO-grown films; that is, the nitrogen becomes concentrated near the interface [Figure 5(b)]. The kinetics of nitrogen accumulation in a 4.5-nm SiO2 film annealed in NO at 850°C is shown in Figure 9. One can see that after a fast initial accumulation, the rate of nitrogen incorporation becomes much slower at >60 min. Also noteworthy is that the total concentration of nitrogen for an NO-annealed preoxide is comparable to the concentration of an NO-grown film oxidized under equivalent conditions, at least for long oxynitridation times (cf. Figure 7).
Figure 9
The N pileup near the interface for the NO-annealed preoxides implies that the dominant transport during NO oxynitridation is NO molecular diffusion to the interface. To verify this idea with isotopic labeling, in Figure 10 we present results of the reaction of an Si18O2 film, oxidized initially with 18O2, that is further reacted with N16O. It is evident that the N and 16O yields near the SiOxNy/Si interface overlap (centered at 4 nm below the surface). The classic Deal-Grove model [131] of silicon oxidation argues that SiO2 film growth occurs by neutral molecular oxygen diffusing through the SiO2 film and reacting at the SiO2/Si interface. We [75, 111, 116, 117] and others [132-134] have refined the model, pointing out the existence of rather complex surface and near-interface (SiO2/Si) reactions; however, the basic tenet of molecular O2 diffusion still holds (at least for films >1.5 nm). No equivalent " standard'' model for N incorporation during oxynitride growth exists. Two likely candidates to explain N incorporation are 1) direct N atom addition at the surface (from N2O, NO, or N atoms present in the gas phase), and 2) NO diffusion to and reaction in the near-interfacial region, analogous to O2 in the Deal-Grove model. If N or O atoms were present at the outer surface and diffused from the surface to the near-interface region, it is unlikely that both would pass atomically through the film without exchanging with lattice oxygen. The energy of an isolated, noninteracting interstitial N or O atom is very high and can be immediately lowered by insertion into an Si-Si, Si-N, or even Si-O bond. Although O is relatively more stable than N in an oxynitride, both O and N atoms should bond immediately to the lattice when present as isolated species inside the film. Isolated N or O atoms introduced at the surface should prefer to incorporate mostly at the surface, with a long tail decaying into the film. Since both N (and an equivalent or greater amount of O) atoms incorporate into the films with similar depth distributions (Figure 10), we propose that NO diffuses molecularly into the SiO2 lattice (analogous to O2 in the Deal-Grove model [131]). We further argue that NO should dissociate when it encounters unoxidized or
Figure 10
partially oxidized Si, just as in the O2 case, which should not occur until the NO (or O2) reaches the near-interfacial region.
N2O oxynitridation
Gas-phase N2O decomposition at high temperatures
In contrast to NO, which is a relatively stable molecule, N2O decomposes rapidly at high temperatures. As we show below, the decomposition is a rather complex process. Gas flow rate, temperature, partial pressure of N2O in the oxidizing ambient, reactor type (RTP vs. furnace) and geometry, and impurity levels are parameters which significantly affect the kinetics and the final distribution of products [60, 61, 89, 135]. N2O also decomposes under UV radiation [136, 137]. The multiparameter nature of the decomposition process makes it difficult to control N2O processing and directly compare results obtained from different laboratories. An additional complication is that N2O decomposition is an exothermic reaction which may cause nonuniformities of the temperature profile in a reactor [61, 138, 139].
Since NOx chemistry has been studied extensively for many years [140] because of its crucial role in combustion reactions and in air pollution, a substantial database of reaction rates and activation energies exists [141]. We used a simple gas-phase reaction model and made computer simulations and analytical studies of the decomposing N2O system, and found it possible to simplify the published mechanisms [79] (for example, Hartig and Tobin [135] use 80 steps) and still obtain similar results, even without including the effects of heat generation and transfer [139] and contaminants (e.g., H2O) [135]. What we found is that of the many possible NOx reactions known to occur (Table 2), the first five key steps seem to dominate the N2O NO decomposition. The rate-limiting one is the first step, N2O N2 + O. The N2O decomposition obeys first-order kinetics. The initial rate law for N2O decomposition is R0 = 2k1[N2O], but rapidly changes to R = k1[N2O] as the reaction proceeds (k1 is the reaction constant of the first reaction). The apparent activation energy for the decomposition of N2O is 2.5 eV/molecule (2.4 x 102 kJ/mol). The characteristic decay time of the N2O concentration is of the order of ~20 s at 1000 K (decreasing with temperature). The oxygen atoms then react further by the two key reactions N2O + O 2NO and N2O + O N2 + O2.
|
Table 2 Reaction scheme for N2O decomposition.
|
|
|
1.
|
|
N2O N2 + O
|
|
2.
|
|
N2O + O NO + NO
|
|
3.
|
|
N2O + O N2 + O2
|
|
4.
|
|
O + O O2
|
|
5.
|
|
NO + O NO2
|
|
6.
|
|
NO2 + O NO + O2
|
|
7.
|
|
NO2 + NO2 NO + NO + O2
|
|
8.
|
|
NO2 NO + O
|
|
9.
|
|
NO2 + NO2 NO3 + NO
|
|
10.
|
|
NO3 + NO NO2 + NO2
|
|
11.
|
|
NO2 + O NO3
|
|
12.
|
|
NO3 NO + O2
|
|
13.
|
|
NO3 + O O2 + NO2
|
|
14.
|
|
NO2 + NO2 N2O4
|
|
15.
|
|
N2O4 NO2 + NO2
|
|
16.
|
|
NO2 + NO3 N2O5
|
|
17.
|
|
N2O5 NO2 + NO3
|
|
18.
|
|
O2 + O O3
|
|
19.
|
|
O3 O2 + O
|
|
20.
|
|
O3 + O O2 + O2
|
|
21.
|
|
O3 + NO NO2 + O2
|
|
The branching ratio for these two reactions lies between 0.1 and 0.5 and varies with conditions. The rate law for NO formation is R = k1[N2O], and the apparent activation energy for the formation of NO is 2.4 eV/molecule (2.3 x 102 kJ/mol).
As seen from Figure 11, the final concentrations of N2, O2, and NO obtained using 5-step and 21-step mechanisms over a temperature range of 1000 K-1400 K are as follows:
|
N2: 65.3%-59.3%,
|
O2: 32.0%-25.7%,
|
NO: 2.7%-15.0%;
(5 steps)
|
|
N2: 65.5%-59.9%,
|
O2: 32.2%-26.5%,
|
NO: 2.3%-13.6%.
(21 steps)
|
Figure 11
Data published by Hartig and Tobin [135] (using a much more complex mechanism) report the gas composition of decomposed N2O at 1223 K as follows:
|
N2: 62%,
|
O2: 28%,
|
NO: 9.5%.
|
This may be compared to N2: 64.3%, O2: 31.0%, and NO: 4.7% reported by Tobin et al. [89], who extracted the data from the early work of Briner et al. [140]. Finally, we note that the results of the calculations (Figure 11) agree qualitatively with recent mass-spectrometry observations of the gas-phase composition during N2O decomposition in a furnace at 1223 K, viz., 61% N2, 27% O2, and 13% NO [142].
The main products of the N2O decomposition are N2, O2, NO (with the equilibrium concentration of NO increasing with temperature). Since N2 is much less reactive than O2 and NO, one could expect that a properly chosen mixture of NO and O2 in the gas phase would produce an oxynitride film similar to that grown in N2O. However, this is not the case. We observed that oxynitridation in a mixture of NO and O2 (with the variable fraction of NO at 20%, 40%, 60%) is in fact much
more similar to NO oxynitridation than to N2O oxynitridation [143]. This suggests that there are other active species present during N2O decomposition which are important in the nitridation process. We believe [162], as do others [60, 61], that atomic oxygen plays a key role in N2O oxynitridation (see the subsection which follows). Though the equilibrium concentration of O is rather low, an intermediate concentration of atomic oxygen released in the first step of the decomposition process (Table 2) may be relatively high, especially if N2O decomposition takes place near the wafer. Second, since oxygen radicals are very reactive, even a small partial pressure of atomic oxygen may have a significant effect on oxynitridation. Nitrous oxide (N2O) has even been used in the surface science community to study the interaction of atomic oxygen with Si surfaces [144]. Finally, we note that reactions of N2O with the Si wafer and the walls of the reactor may accelerate the decomposition process.
Nitrogen incorporation and removal during N2O oxynitridation
Under equivalent conditions, N2O yields less nitrogen incorporation than NO. Figure 12 shows MEIS spectra for thin (~5 nm) oxynitride films grown in NO and N2O under similar conditions. By integrating the areas under the nitrogen peaks of the spectra, one can readily see that the N2O-grown oxynitride has much less incorporated nitrogen. The total concentration of nitrogen increases with temperature (Figure 4) and film thickness [20]. This implies that, in addition to thermal budget considerations, N2O processing may not be an efficient source of nitrogen for films thinner than ~3 nm. The nitrogen distribution in the films is sensitive not only to the processing conditions but also to the reactor type [60, 61, 127]. Specifically, SiOxNy films grown in a furnace and in an RTP reactor have qualitatively different nitrogen depth profiles (Figure 3). The RTN2O film shows N pileup near the interface, while the distribution of N in the furnace-grown film is broader. The difference was attributed to the gas-phase chemistry of N2O decomposition (see the related subsection) and its subsequent effect on film composition. In the RTN2O case, the decomposition takes place near the hot wafer [60, 84], so that most of the decomposition products (including atomic oxygen) can reach the wafer, whereas in a conventional furnace the gas decomposes in the hot inlet of the furnace before it reaches the wafer. This also explains gas-flow effects, i.e., lower nitrogen incorporation rates for lower N2O flow rates.
Figure 12
The rate of film growth in N2O is much slower than that in O2 and is related to the amount of nitrogen in the film [20, 32, 142, 145]. Furthermore, the growth rate on the Si(100) surface is slower than that on the (111) and (110) surfaces [146]. Several attempts have been made to model the growth kinetics [82, 88, 142]. A model by Dimitrijev et al. explains the slower growth rate by an exponential (with time) decrease of so-called " reactive sites'' near the interface [82]. Other models used a scheme similar to the Deal-Grove model of the thermal oxidation of silicon [88].
The fundamental difference between oxynitridation in N2O and NO is that while both incorporate nitrogen (by NO reactions near the interface), in the N2O case the nitrogen incorporation occurs simultaneously with nitrogen removal from the upper layers of the film. Saks et al. found in N2O/O2/N2O studies that the final exposure of the N2O/O2-grown film (with nitrogen in the middle of the film) to N2O results in nitrogen removal from the " bulk'' of the film and new nitrogen incorporation near the interface [128]. Similar behavior was also observed in our MEIS studies (Figure 13). One can see that for an (NO/O2) oxynitride film exposed to N2O (i.e., NO/O2/N2O), the nitrogen concentration in the middle of the film decreases, whereas for the film annealed in NO (i.e., NO/O2/NO) this effect was not observed--only incorporation of new nitrogen near the interface takes place. In these studies, the removal was also implied by an acceleration of the film growth.
Figure 13
There have been at least two alternative viewpoints on the mechanism of N removal: Carr et al. [60, 61] proposed that atomic oxygen causes nitrogen removal, whereas Saks et al. [128] argued that NO is responsible. Both NO and O are (intermediate) products of N2O gas-phase decomposition at high temperatures (see the related subsection). Our recent NO/O2/NO experiments suggest that NO does not effectively remove nitrogen from the oxynitride. On the basis of this observation and the even distribution of nitrogen throughout NO-grown films (except for the topmost layer of the oxide) observed in our work (Figure 8) and by others [37], one can conclude that NO (when directly introduced as a key reactant) has a very low reactivity toward nitrogen removal compared to N2O and its decomposition products [60, 128]. Exposure of an oxynitride film to ozone (an effective source of atomic oxygen) causes nitrogen removal from the film, which supports the atomic oxygen hypothesis [60]. However, the role of atomic oxygen in nitrogen removal must be better understood. We note that nitrogen is also removed from the film by a high boron flux from the polysilicon gate [147].
Mechanisms of nitridation in NO and N2O and nitrogen profiles in the film
Figure 14 is a schematic summary of the processes discussed above that occur during silicon (oxy)nitridation. N2O rapidly decomposes in the gas phase to N2 and O, and the O then initiates a further series of reactions to form NO, the key oxynitriding agent, and other species. NO is similar to O2 when it interacts with Si and SiO2, in that the dominant oxynitride growth mechanism involves NO diffusion through an SiOxNy overlayer, followed by a reaction with silicon at and near the SiOxNy/Si interface. The thermochemistry of the system is such that nitrogen, although thermodynamically unstable in the growing film relative to oxygen, appears to become kinetically trapped at the SiO2/Si interface during growth. Alternatively, it may lower the interfacial stress, and therefore be stable only near the interface. The final nitrogen concentration and distribution is influenced by a competition between N incorporation and removal. The removal reaction is likely due to atomic oxygen. Since the reactivities of NO, N2O, and O2 with Si, SiO2, and SiOxNy are quite different, properly chosen sequences of thermal reactions with Si can lead to oxynitride films with different nitrogen concentrations and profiles, and therefore electrical properties.
Figure 14
As an illustration, in Figure 15 we schematically present several reaction sequences and resultant N profiles that we (and others) have observed. We note that most of the reactions are very condition-dependent; as pressure, film thickness, heating mode (conventional furnace vs. rapid thermal), etc. are changed, the N profiles can change significantly.
Figure 15
Nitridation in N2
Though molecular nitrogen is believed to be relatively inert, it was observed in early papers that annealing of SiO2 films in N2 results in the initial reduction of fixed oxide charge [98]. This behavior was attributed to the formation of an SiOxNy layer near the interface as monitored by XPS [87]. These nitridation reactions were performed in a furnace at high temperature (>925°C) for 1 hr (i.e., requiring a high thermal budget). To reduce the thermal budget, we grew oxynitrides in nominally pure N2 by rapid thermal processing [80]. We use the term " nominally'' to mean that although the input N2 gas stream is purified at the point of use and therefore extremely free of contaminants (less than 1 ppb each of H2O, O2, CO2, and CO), a cold-wall RTP module contributes impurities to the ambient through outgassing from the walls. Although the Si/N2 system may be relatively inert for T < 1200°C, the Si/N2/H2O/H2/O2 system is probably not. Thus, we observed that N2 reacts with Si at moderate temperatures (850-1050°C) in an RTP module (due to the presence of gas-phase impurities) to form ultrathin (less than 1.2 nm) films as measured by ellipsometry (using n = 1.47), cross-sectional TEM, and MEIS.
Figure 16 illustrates nitrogen content (measured by NRA) as a function of N2 nitridation time for RTN2 treatment at various temperatures [80]. At 850°C, the nitrogen content is almost constant with time, whereas at the higher temperatures it increases and then may saturate with time. It can be seen from Figure 16 that anywhere from 0.2 to 3 ML of nitrogen can be incorporated, depending upon temperature and time. Figure 17 is a plot of the ratio N/(N + O) as a function of RTN2 time at 850, 950, and 1050°C. The ratio increases with increasing temperature and time, and appears to approach that of the high-temperature stoichiometric compound Si2N2O. The RTN2 films may consist of amorphous mixtures of SiO2 and Si2N2O. Mixtures of Si2N2O, Si3N4, and SiO2 phases have similarly been observed in plasma-deposited oxynitrides [148]. Oxygen and nitrogen depth profiling by MEIS shows a fairly uniform distribution of the elements in the films.
Figure 16
Figure 17
Nitridation in NH3
Nitridation in ammonia was one of the first methods used to incorporate relatively high (~10-15 at.%) concentrations of nitrogen into SiO2 films [3, 10, 11, 59, 96]. XPS and AES depth profiles show that nitrogen piles up both at the interface and at the outer surface during the initial stages of nitridation [149]. The nitrogen-containing region near the interface was reported to be about 3 nm wide. As nitridation time increases, the concentration of nitrogen slowly increases, and the distribution becomes more uniform throughout the film [10, 11]. The thickness of the film remains essentially unchanged during nitridation. Nitrogen incorporation is enhanced by decreasing the SiO2 film thickness [10, 11].
The nitridation atmosphere of NH3 introduces high concentrations of hydrogen into SiO2 films, which then can act as traps. SIMS analysis shows that the hydrogen concentration increases monotonically with nitridation time and becomes higher for higher temperatures. The hydrogen tends to pile up near the interface [150]. It has been shown that the high concentration of hydrogen can be reduced by a postnitridation anneal in a hydrogen-free ambient (e.g., N2). It has also been found that the rate of hydrogen reduction is not dependent on the annealing gas (N2 or O2), indicating thermally activated out-diffusion of hydrogen from the film [10, 11]. Because of the detrimental effects of hydrogen on device performance, lighter nitridation (lower temperature, shorter time) is desirable, since it introduces less hydrogen into the film.
Finally, we note that ammonia can be used for direct nitridation of Si. In this reaction scheme, NH3 reacts with the Si surface at high temperatures to produce an ultrathin layer of silicon nitride [151-153], although again caution must be taken to minimize oxygen incorporation if it is not desired.
6. Nitridation by chemical and physical deposition methods
In this section, we briefly outline some deposition techniques for preparing ultrathin (oxy)nitride films. More details about deposition techniques can be found in review papers [19, 40]. CVD methods, using the existing " infrastructure'' of commercially available reactors and precursors, are employed in many different silicon processing steps. High-temperature (~800°C) deposition of oxynitrides can be performed by reacting SiH4 (or SiH2Cl2) with a mixture of N2O and NH3. Without ammonia in the gas phase, no nitrogen incorporation takes place; only SiO2 is deposited. The composition of the film, stress, refractive index, and growth rate are dependent on the flow rate. The concentration of incorporated nitrogen (and hydrogen) increases with an increase in the ratio of NH3/N2O flow rate. The viability of this technique has been demonstrated for making device-quality ultrathin (~3-4 nm) nitrided SiO2 films and oxide/nitride stacks [18]. For this, reduced pressures of the reactants and RTP reactors are used. As with most other deposition methods, CVD requires postdeposition treatment to stabilize the film structure, drive hydrogen out, and minimize electrical defects. Figure 18 shows nitrogen MEIS depth profiles for a 4-nm-thick RTCVD-deposited film (800°C, 3 Torr, N2O flow rate of 500 sccm, NH3/N2O ratio of 0.05, and SiH4/N2O ratio of 0.0128) after annealing in Ar, O2, and N2O. One can see that the film annealed in Ar has nitrogen distributed almost evenly in the film, while annealing in N2O causes nitrogen removal from the film, as discussed in the subsection on nitrogen incorporation and removal during N2O oxynitridation. Finally, we note the interesting idea of oxynitride deposition at quite low temperature (330°C) using photo-enhanced CVD of Si2H6, NH3, and NO2 [154].
Figure 18
Plasma-assisted nitridation is a well-known deposition method for low-temperature processing [19, 40, 149, 155]. First discussed in the 1970s, several reaction schemes and different reactor types (e.g., rf, ECR, etc.) have been reported for plasma-enhanced deposition of silicon nitride. The traditional scheme includes the reaction of SiH4 and NH3 in a plasma at 200-400°C. The use of N2 instead of ammonia helps to reduce the hydrogen content in the film; however, ionization of nitrogen is more difficult. N2O can also be used for plasma-assisted nitridation of ultrathin SiO2 films. To minimize the damage to the substrate by energetic particles, a remote plasma deposition method has been developed [19]. In this process, the nitrogen-containing species are plasma-excited outside the reactor chamber. Then the excited species are extracted from the plasma region and react with the substrate. As in the case of the conventional CVD process, the composition of the film is determined in part by the ratio of gas flow of the reactive species. More details about plasma-assisted nitridation can be found in review papers [19].
Another nitridation technique based on energetic nitrogen particles is low-energy ion implantation 45-47, 50-52, 55, 84, 156]. The nitridation of the gate-oxide film can be performed in two different sequences: low-energy nitrogen ions can be implanted into already grown oxide, or nitrogen can be implanted into the silicon substrate, which is subsequently oxidized [83, 84, 156]. In the former case, the energy of the nitrogen ions should be low enough to avoid penetration (and damage) to the silicon substrate. The penetration depth of the ions decreases with ion energy. As a reference, the penetration depth of 1-keV nitrogen ions in SiO2 is about 4 nm and decreases to ~2.3 nm for 0.5-keV ions, which sets a limit for the ion energies for ultrathin oxides. Figure 19 shows MEIS nitrogen depth distributions for an ~3.5-nm SiO2 film nitrided by implantation of nitrogen ions of different energies. These data illustrate the increasing penetration depth and concentration of incorporated nitrogen (for the same dose) with ion energy. The mechanism of low-energy implantation is different from that of conventional high-energy implantation [55]. When the low-energy ion approaches the surface, it becomes neutralized within about 1 nm of the surface. As a result, the nitridation is then caused by diffusion, reaction, and desorption of this hot nitrogen atom. Owing to desorption (and sputtering) steps, this complex process typically results in a concentration of implanted nitrogen that is lower than the implantation dose. When the nitrogen ions are implanted into the silicon prior to the oxidation, a reduction in reliability is observed [156]. Subsequent high-temperature oxidation results in the loss of some nitrogen, and its segregation and accumulation near the interface, which in turn leads to improved electrical properties.
Figure 19
The recently developed jet vapor deposition (JVD) method utilizes a high-speed jet of a light carrier gas to transport the relevant species onto the Si substrate to form nitride films at room temperature [43]. In this process, diluted silane and a mixture of N2 + He flow through nozzles into a microwave discharge region near the outer nozzle exit. Reactive Si species and N atoms formed in the discharge region are transported in the sonic He jet to the Si substrate, where they form a nitride. The film composition and growth rate are determined by the SiH4/He/N2 ratio and the flow rate. This technique has been shown to be capable of producing device-quality (both capacitors and transistors) ultrathin films. However, the uniformity of ultrathin films deposited over a large wafer (limited by the small size of the nozzle) and oxygen incorporated into the film are of concern for practical applications.
Atomic layer deposition, or ALD (also known as atomic layer epitaxy, ALE, or atomic layer CVD, AL-CVD), a technique based on selective reactivity of gaseous and surface species, allows one to produce in a controlled matter ultrathin films with a rate of approximately one monolayer per deposition cycle [157, 158]. This technique has been used to deposit thin films of various dielectric materials, including SiO2. However, to the best of our knowledge, a procedure for preparing nitrided SiO2 films by ALD has not yet been established. Goto et al. proposed a process of making thin (2-10 nm) silicon nitride films by repetitive plasma nitridation cycles of Si by NH3 and deposition of Si by SiH2Cl2 thermal reaction [44]. The deposition rate was found to be nearly half a monolayer per deposition cycle, and the deposited films showed thickness uniformity much better than that of remote plasma CVD films [44].
Finally, we note that very reactive nitrogen atoms can be used for Si and SiO2 nitridation, as was demonstrated in early studies [53, 54]. The interaction of nitrogen atoms with a silicon surface can produce a thin (~2-3 nm) layer of silicon nitride. However, the practical use of the nitrogen atoms in the near future may be limited by the lack of available sources of atomic nitrogen that can generate a uniform beam over a large wafer.
7. Nitrogen engineering of ultrathin nitrided oxides
On the basis of our understanding of the kinetics and thermodynamics of nitrogen incorporation in SiO2, ultrathin oxynitride films with nitrogen-enhanced layers located in specific regions of a film can be achieved. Both thermal nitridation methods and deposition techniques can be used. To tailor the nitrogen content and distribution within the ultrathin dielectric by a thermal method, one can employ the fact that N2O, NO, and O2 gases behave differently with respect to nitrogen incorporation and removal, as discussed in the subsection on nitrogen incorporation and removal during N2O oxynitridation.
One thermal process scheme that we have used to achieve a double-peaked nitrogen profile is as follows [81]. First, a thin oxide layer containing a high concentration of nitrogen is grown by reacting NO with Si. (Other surface nitridation methods may also work, though some of the techniques, for example N2O oxynitridation, may yield an insufficient concentration of nitrogen in ultrathin films [33].) The oxynitride film is then reoxidized in O2, which results in a new oxide layer grown beneath the original oxynitride. We and others have demonstrated that such reoxidation does not significantly change the already incorporated nitrogen concentration [62, 128]. In the third step, the sample is nitrided in NO--a key step. NO diffuses to the interface and does not remove nitrogen from the interior of the film [62, 76]. Therefore, the top nitrogen peak remains undisturbed. The MEIS results (Figure 20) clearly demonstrate that the NO/O2/NO sample has nitrogen-enhanced layers located near both the top (SiO2/polysilicon) and bottom (Si/SiO2) of the oxynitride film. One can see that a longer third-step NO annealing time (40 min) results in a higher concentration of nitrogen near the interface. In this scheme, one should be careful using N2O in the final step, because it removes incorporated nitrogen. Finally, we note that nitrogen-layered structures can also be produced by deposition methods [18, 19, 41, 49]) or by a combination of thermal nitridation/deposition methods.
Figure 20
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank L. C. Feldman, G. Lucovsky, D. Buchanan, H. Du, and M. Copel for useful discussions; D. Brasen and T. Sorsch for their help with oxynitride films by thermal methods; W. Lennard, I. Baumvol, and F. Stedile for nuclear reaction analysis; and E. Vogel and J. J. Wortman, who collaborated with us on LPCVD oxynitrides. The Rutgers group acknowledges support from NSF under Grant No. DMR-9705367 and from SRC under Grant No. 97-BJ-451.
Received March 1, 1998; accepted for publication October 21, 1998
|