|
The need for high-permittivity gate insulators
Field-effect transistors (FETs) continue to be the backbone of the integrated-circuit industry. The success of the integrated circuit is largely built upon the near perfection of the SiO2/Si interface. As MOSFET dimensions have scaled, correspondingly larger values of the oxide capacitance (Cox) have been required. The oxide capacitance is necessary to invert the surface to a sufficient sheet charge density to obtain the desired current for the given supply voltage and to avoid short-channel behavior. Short-channel behavior leads to increased output conductance in the saturation regime (channel length modulation), increased leakage in the subthreshold regime (drain-induced barrier lowering), anda dependence of the threshold voltage (Vt) on the channel length. The last two effects are particularly acute problems in deeply scaled FETs where low supply voltages produce a severe tradeoff between performance and leakage. Short- channel effects that reduce threshold voltage control and increase the subthreshold slope increase the leakage current exponentially. Incomplete scaling of the gate oxide could therefore make the manufacture of high-density integrated circuits based on sub-0.1-µm MOSFETs impractical.
Figure 1 shows a plot of the gate-oxide equivalent (GOE1) thickness required for a SiO2 gate insulator as a function of time as projected by the 1997 National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (NTRS) [1]. A range of SiO2 thickness is expected at each technology node. Thinner oxides are used in performance-driven applications, while thicker oxides are used in power-limited applications. In general, however, the roadmap predicts a direct scaling of the gate-oxide thickness. As the gate oxide thins, however, the gate leakage current rises sharply because of direct tunneling between the semiconductor bands and the gate electrode. Figure 2 shows leakage current measured at 1.0 V gate bias [2, 3] as a function of the SiO2 thickness. The minimum acceptable value for gate leakage is determined by performance and power-dissipation concerns. The absolute limit is application-dependent. Generally accepted values range from 1 mA/cm2 for power-limited applications to 10 A/cm2 for performance-driven circuits. Thus, the absolute limit for physical silicon dioxide thickness is approximately 1.6 to 2.0 nm. Reliability or other concerns could limit the scaling of SiO2 to values somewhat larger than this.
Figure 1
Figure 2
One might therefore consider replacement materials for SiO2, particularly for extremely thin silicon oxide. Nitrided oxides have been used for some time, primarily to increase the dielectric diffusion resistance. While the introduction of nitrogen increases the dielectric constant slightly, it also decreases the bandgap. Thus, only modest increases in gate-oxide capacitance can be achieved for a given leakage current by simple nitrogen incorporation. We have shown that for simple dielectrics [4], bandgap generally decreases as permittivity increases. Alternatively, one can use lattice-polarizable materials for the gate insulator. In these materials a high permittivity is obtained by a physical displacement of one or more atoms in a response to an applied electric field. Most lattice-polarizable materials are metal oxides. For high-permittivity materials, the GOE is typically much less than the physical thickness. As a result, it is possible to substantially reduce direct tunneling currents while obtaining the necessary small values of the GOE.
A number of research groups are currently studying high-permittivity materials such as Ta2O5 ( ~ 25) and SrTiO3 ( ~ 150). We have chosen to study TiO2 as a prototypical alternate gate dielectric for deep-submicron MOSFETs because of its high permittivity and because of the acceptance of titanium in most modern CMOS fabrication facilities. Studies of thin films of TiO2 typically report dielectric constants that range from 40 to 86 [5-8]. It is believed that this variability is related to the presence of low-permittivity interfacial layers and to the dependence of permittivity on crystalline phase. Titanium dioxide forms in a number of phases. By far the most common are anatase [Figure 3(a)] and rutile [Figure 3(b)], which normally forms at temperatures above 800°C. The bandgap of the material is reported to be between 3.0 and 3.5 eV, again depending on the crystalline phase. In a comparison of SiO2 and TiO2 as FET gate insulators, thicker layers of TiO2 are used for the same GOE. This prevents direct tunneling between the gate and substrate, but leakage current remains a concern because the bandgap is reduced from approximately 9 eV to about 3 eV. The thicker layers that can be used prevent direct tunneling, but thermionic emission is a serious concern, particularly if the band alignment is not favorable. Our previous work demonstrated that the leakage current at moderate bias was determined by thermionic emission over a 1.0-eV barrier that we assumed to be the conduction-band discontinuity [9]. While not competitive with thick SiO2 layers, TiO2 could provide a potentially viable approach to dielectrics whose oxide equivalent thickness is less than 2.0 nm.
Figure 3
Effects of deposition parameters
Deposition of the TiO2 films was carried out by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) using titanium tetrakis isopropoxide (TTIP) and titanium nitrate (TN). The latter is a carbon- and hydrogen-free precursor, which is particularly well suited to the high-purity deposition required for this application. Our group has synthesized a number of these nitrato compounds for use as CVD deposition precursors [10]. The reactor is a conventional low-pressure stagnation-point flow system in which the gas flows downward, impinging directly on the susceptor. This type of reactor produces a vertical boundary layer thickness independent of position [11]. The wafer temperature is maintained with a ceramic electric heater. Wafer temperatures were measured by optical pyrometry using a reactor optical access port. Typical deposition pressures were 3 to 8 Torr. X-ray diffraction was used to determine film crystallinity. Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), forward recoil spectroscopy (FRES), Auger, and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) have been used to determine the film's chemical composition.
Figure 4 shows the effect of deposition temperature on the film morphology of TN-deposited layers. Film thickness was kept constant at approximately 100 nm. While much thicker than the approximately 5-nm films that will be needed for FET insulators, these thick films allow relatively easy electron microscopy of the grain structure. At the lowest temperature (~170°C), completely amorphous films were obtained [Figure 4(a)]. These films were highly specular and demonstrated no measurable thickness variation over 7:1-aspect-ratio features. As the temperature was increased to slightly over 200°C, anatase crystals in an amorphous background were observed [Figure 4(b)]. Increasing the temperature further led to rough anatase films [Figure 4(c)]. Interestingly, the films appear to arrange themselves into large regions or domains that were easily observed by electron microscopy. As the deposition temperature was increased to about 500°C, the films became considerably smoother [Figure 4(d)]. Cross-sectional micrographs showed that films grown at these temperatures were columnar, with grain widths of about 10 to 20 nm. Films grown above 600°C were primarily rutile. Mixed phases were seen in films grown at intermediate temperatures. Annealing films grown at low temperature caused them to show the high-temperature microstructure and led to an anatase-to-rutile phase transition, as summarized in Table 1. Very similar results were obtained for TTIP depositions at temperatures above 300°C. Low-temperature TTIP depositions, however, were much less crystalline than TN depositions at the same temperature.
Figure 4
|
Table 1 Summary of X-ray diffraction measurements of the effects of deposition temperature and annealing conditions on TTIP-deposited films. A indicates the presence of the anatase phase, R the rutile phase. Capital letters indicate strong peaks of the phase; lower case indicates weak peaks of that phase. All anneals were done for 30 minutes in O2.
|
|
Deposition temperature (°C)
|
As-deposited
|
650°C anneal
|
750°C anneal
|
850°C anneal
|
|
|
330
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|
380
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A, r
|
|
465
|
A
|
A, r
|
R, a
|
R
|
|
550
|
A, r
|
A, R
|
R
|
R
|
|
620
|
A, R
|
a, R
|
R
|
R
|
|
660
|
R
|
R
|
R
|
R
|
|
Electrical performance of capacitors
While both capacitors [12] and transistors [4] have previously been reported, a detailed understanding of the conduction regimes has been lacking until now. Figure 5 shows a typical J-V characteristic for a composite gate structure consisting of 19 nm of TiO2 on top of an interfacial layer approximately 3 nm thick consisting of a mixture of O, Ti, and Si. For simplicity we refer to this interfacial layer as SiO2, although recent results suggest that the permittivity of this layer is larger than 3.9 owing to the presence of the metal oxide.
Figure 5
The TiO2 film was deposited at 420°C and was postdeposition annealed at 750°C in O2. After platinum gate metallization and etching, the film was annealed at 450°C in hydrogen. The current density, g, shown in Figure 5(a) is divided into three distinct regimes. At lowbiases [Figure 5(b)], the current is dominated by a hopping mechanism. Only weak dependence on temperature is seen, indicating that if the conduction mechanism is Frenkel-Poole [13], the traps involved are quite shallow. The value of the current in this regime depends strongly on the TiO2 deposition conditions and on postdeposition anneals. As the bias is increased, the leakage current increases exponentially. As shown by Figure 5(c), the current density in this regime increases with the square root of the electric field strength, E1/2, as described by conventional thermionic emission theory [14]. By biasing the device into accumulation and measuring the leakage current as a function of temperature, we have found that the valence-band offset is approximately 1.0 eV. Similar measurements taken in inversion produced similar results, but the current was found to saturate at high temperatures. We have shown that this saturation behavior was simply caused by the minority-carrier generation rate. If FETs were used instead of capacitors, no saturation behavior was observed. We have taken these barriers to represent the valence- and conduction-band offsets between SiO2 and TiO2. The sum of the offsets and the silicon bandgap is in reasonably good agreement with the TiO2 bandgaps reported in the literature (3.2 eV for crystalline anatase films and 3.0 eV for films in the rutile phase [15]). Further increasing the gate bias produces another break in the slope of the J-V characteristic. Conduction in this regime is dominated by the conventional Fowler-Nordheim relationship, as shown in Figure 5(d). The three conduction mechanisms are summarized schematically in Figure 6. The hopping mechanism is shown for a discrete state at the interface between the TiO2 and the interfacial layer; however, traps over a range of positions and energies are expected to contribute. Hole conduction is expected to dominate for negative gate bias in these devices owing to the large work function of the Pt gate.
Figure 6
The effect of current stressing on the reliability of TiO2 films depends on the bias condition during stress. When the device is biased in the Fowler-Nordheim regime, electrons tunnel into the conduction band of the SiO2 and fall into the conduction band of the TiO2, where they may thermalize. The band offset between the conduction bands of TiO2 and SiO2 is expected to be approximately 2.4 eV. Thus, biasing the device in this regime can cause dramatic degradation to the device, as demonstrated in Figure 7. The device biased in the thermionic regime shows essentially no degradation in J-V characteristics after prolonged electrical stress, although a shift in the minima of the J-V characteristics suggests that charge is being trapped. Devices stressed in the Fowler-Nordheim regime, however, showed dramatic, irreversible increases in the leakage current. It should be noted, however, that because of the exponential dependence of leakage current and gate bias, it is difficult to separate the effects of total fluence from bias voltage without using inordinately long stress experiments.
Figure 7
It is also possible to trap charge near the SiO2/TiO2 interface. Consider the case of an accumulation bias of a p-type substrate when the device is biased into the thermionic emission regime. Electrons in the conduction band of the TiO2 may gain sufficient energy (~3 eV) to undergo impact ionization. Positive charges then drift to the interface, where they become trapped if the interfacial oxide thickness is large enough to prevent hole tunneling. This charge accumulation, which may occur in local, shallow traps, leads to a band distortion that can also increase the leakage current. Detrapping currents are probable causes of the J-V offsets seen in Figure 7. The effect of weakly trapped charge was further demonstrated by investigating the effects of opposite polarity biasing after stressing the device in the thermionic emission regime. By applying sufficient positive gate bias, the accumulated charge is allowed to drain out of the interface, and the leakage current is largely recovered. Alternatively, the J-V curves were completely recovered after a 150°C anneal, suggesting rather shallow traps for some of the charged species.
Figure 8 shows the capacitance-voltage characteristics of composite-gate structures. For thin layers of TiO2, a voltage-dependent accumulation capacitance is always observed. While variations of the accumulation-layer thickness may give rise to a voltage dependence, the variation observed here is too large to be explained by this mechanism. Furthermore, when observing low-frequency characteristics, a much less pronounced effect is observed. We therefore believe that at least part of this effect is the tunneling of carriers into states at or near the TiO2/SiO2 interface. Since these charges are above the interfacial SiO2 layer, they correspond to a capacitance closer to that of the TiO2 alone. Thus, both the composite insulator and the TiO2-only insulator may be considered to act in parallel; the relative area of the two capacitors depends on the density and areal coverage of the traps. Higher biases may increase the number of states into which carriers can tunnel, thereby leading to an increased capacitance.
Figure 8
Modeling of composite-gate insulators
The composite-gate insulator was modeled using the Nanotechnology Engineering Modeling (NEMO) code [16, 17]. NEMO is a quantum-mechanical 1D code that simultaneously solves Poisson's and Schroedinger's equations to predict electron and current densities for heterostructure materials. These currents take into account thermionic emission, conventional tunneling, and resonant tunneling. The simulator makes use of the self-consistent Born approximation to calculate the retarded Green's function. Once the Green's function is known, the electron density and the transmission probabilities for both bound and continuum states are then calculated to predict a gate leakage current. A semiclassical (Thomas-Fermi) model was used to calculate charge distributions. The bound states at the Si/SiO2 interface were calculated, along with their occupancy for each gate bias. One of the more interesting features of the code is its ability to partition the device into large charge reservoirs which are treated semiclassically and smaller regions near the material interface over which more exact calculations are performed. The version of NEMO used in this work does not accommodate traps and therefore underestimates leakage current at low bias values.
Titanium dioxide was modeled as a 3.2-eV-bandgap material with a 1.0-eV conduction-band offset to the Si and a permittivity ( ) of 60. This value was determinedby two techniques. Very thick (>100 nm) samples were fabricated and the capacitance measured. In addition, the capacitance of TiO2 insulators was measured as a function of TiO2 thickness. Both measurements suggested that = 60 within 10%. Aside from the bandgap, band offsets, and permittivity, the TiO2 layer was modeled as SiO2. Although a gross approximation, the current through the TiO2 at current densities of interest is limited by charge injection rather than by the details of the conduction mechanisms inside the material. The tunneling effective mass of SiO2 was taken as 0.41 from the measurements of Brar et al. [2]. The model was verified by comparing voltage- and thickness-dependent results of Brar and of Buchanan [3]. A single-band approximation was used for both SiO2 and TiO2. Material thickness was estimated from both TEM data and C-V measurements.
Figure 9 shows a comparison of calculated and experimental results, assuming 16 nm of TiO2 on top of 3.2 nm of SiO2. Notice that there is generally good agreement. The major difference occurs at currents below 1 V, once again suggesting that the trap density is controlling the leakage current in this regime. The dependence of the predicted I-V characteristics is shown in more detail in Figure 10, where NEMO was used to predict the effect of thinning the interfacial oxide on the leakage currents while holding the TiO2 layer fixed. The interfacial oxide thickness is seen as the dominant parameter for biases much above 1.0 V, while the high permittivity was significantly more important at lower biases. Layer structures down to 7.5 nm TiO2 on 0.5 nm SiO2 were simulated. These calculations hold out significant hope that if techniques for thinning this interfacial layer are developed, and if the trap density in these layers can be kept low enough to minimize hopping conduction, it is possible to obtain low leakage currents.
Figure 9
Figure 10
Conclusions and future structures
We have fabricated and characterized a number of structures using TiO2 as a high-permittivity gate insulator. The deposition and subsequent anneal of these films give rise to an interfacial layer of SiO2 that is typically of the order of 3 nm thick. The composite layered structure is surprisingly robust except at large biases, where carriers injected into the conduction band of the interfacial layer can thermalize near the TiO2/SiO2 interface and create damage. Early simulations of the composite structure using NEMO suggest generally good agreement with experimental data. These simulations reinforce the idea that, owing to the small band offsets in these materials, the effective reduction in leakage current is only significant at low bias. Given bias voltages of the order of 1 V, however, it appears possible to use extremely thin interfacial layers and still have adequately low leakage currents, if the band offsets of the high-permittivity layer are at least comparable to those of TiO2. Critical to the successful application of these structures to 0.1-µm devices, therefore, will be the development of techniques to prevent the formation of thick interfacial oxides. This may involve passivating the interface with some appropriate diffusion barrier or using higher-stability high-permittivity layers.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Semiconductor Research Corporation under Contract No. BJ479 and the continued support of the Motorola and Texas Instruments companies.
References
Footnotes
1
To facilitate the comparison of alternate materials, it is helpful to introduce the concept of the gate-oxide equivalent thickness. The GOE is defined to be the thickness of SiO2 that would provide the same accumulation capacitance as a given film. Notice that this is a purely electrical definition and may be quite different from a physical thickness, particularly for materials whose permittivity is substantially different from that of SiO2.
Received March 31, 1998; accepted for publication March 8, 1999
|