Game 2, black
34...f6
Commentary for black move 34:
PATRICK WOLFF: Well, I think that raises a very important point,
which is that yesterday's victory was very, very impressive by
Kasparov, but let's not forget that Kasparov had the white
pieces. And having the white pieces is always an advantage.
It's especially an advantage when playing against the computer,
because when you have the white pieces, you can control the
tempo of the game in the early part much more easily, and
that's exactly what Kasparov did. He kept the position closed,
he gave himself a small positional advantage, didn'ts do
anything too quick, too fast. The computer wasn't able to get
close enough to him to really touch him.
And so Kasparov said to get the kind of position he wanted he had
to do very well with tactics in the middle but managed to keep
control.
So it looked as if this was going to be very overwhelming by
Kasparov. But now it seems that when the computer has white,
Kasparov has played a completely different opening than he
usually does. He has avoided the tactical skirmishes he
usually encourages because he's afraid of the computer's
ability -- maybe I shouldn't say Garry's afraid of the
computer's ability --
MAURICE ASHLEY: Respectful.
PATRICK WOLFF: Respectful of the computer's abilities, changed
his style of play. That has given the computer an advantage in
the game which the computer has I think pressed very, very
well. I think what we've seen here is if the play continues as
we've seen so far, we may have a back and forth match all the
way to the end. It may be that the advantage of the white
pieces is a larger advantage than normal.
MIKE VALVO: I think this is a much more impressive game than the
win they had in the first game last year.
PATRICK WOLFF: Yes, the win that the IBM team had in the first
game last year had the smell of being a little bit luck
/AOEFPLT it was a good game by Deep Blue, no question about it,
but Deep Blue did so many strange things and they all worked
out in the end. And you could tell that Garry wasn't used to
playing the machine, he didn't quite appreciate how much
different this kind of opponent was. This time around if the
computer manages to win this game what we're going to see is a
computer, you know, playing Garry Kasparov, the world
champion,
the greatest chess player whosever lived, versus the greatest
chess player who has never lived. The greatest chess player
who has ever lived, in a great game.
MAURICE ASHLEY: Let's not count Garry out, I don't know about
you, but we're still playing some moves here, and Garry
Kasparov is the world champion, he's been that way for 12
years, and let's assume he knows a little something-something
that we don't know about the position, and he'll come up with
something to save his butt, even though I don't think it looks
very good for him right now.
Let's get a question from the audience.
AUDIENCE MEMBER:
AUDIENCE MEMBER: I just wanted to ask Mr. Wolff, on move 33
you
said that black had to take the knight, either bishop takes
knight or Nf5. You just said that had to be made. I'm just
wondering is Nb7 is a -- Nb7 a possibility in that position
considering the fact that you could just not exchange knights?
PATRICK WOLFF: No question that was a possibility. The reason I
was wary of this move is that this knight is such a powerful
piece and on b7 is so weak. For example, perhaps white could
play Bxf8 Qxf8 and now to borrow
YASSER's idea of Qb6. Qg3 is
also possible. If Qg3, bishop takes knight. At any rate this
looks very powerful to me. This looks to me like Garry would
be having real problems. In fact it's possible this position
is already winning material for white. For example, if bishop
takes f5 Qxb7. This bishop is attacked and also pawn takes
pawn is a going concern. So this could be a real problem for
black.
So I mean I can't prove that black would have to capture the
knight on f5. That will take a little more time, but I think
it's probably the case.
MAURICE ASHLEY: I am somewhat surprised that Deep Blue is
taking
so long on this move. It always moves quicker than this. And
I have to say I'm very surprised. Maybe it sees the win of the
pawn as just making absolutely sure that there are no chances
for Kasparov. It is taking quite a long time. It never takes
this long too move -- to move.
MIKE VALVO: There's two possibilities with computers in a
situation like this. First of all, it's got extra time, and it
may try to go one more full ply. It sees it has enough time to
do that and may try to do that. Secondly there's probably a
lot of extensions in this position, a lot of captures and
recaptures and it's going to follow them all to the end. And
that's time-consuming. Even if it guessed Garry's move, it
might have gone for the next ply, if it could.
PATRICK WOLFF: One thing I found very impressive is that both
sides, particularly Kasparov in the first game I think have
used their time very well. In the first game, Kasparov used
all of his time but was never in time trouble, and that's very
good. That's exactly what you want to do. Here it seems to me
like Deep Blue is using its time very well. It's got a
critical position here, maybe one as Mike suggested hadn't
looked at as carefully, and it's doing exactly what you should
do in such a situation. It's bideing its time and trying to
figure out what the best move is.
MAURICE ASHLEY: Almost like an experienced Grandmaster
would.
PATRICK WOLFF: Absolutely.
MAURICE ASHLEY: Another question?
AUDIENCE MEMBER: How about asking the audience to vote as to
who's going to win the game? I vote that Deep Blue is going to
win.
MAURICE ASHLEY: Got the poll.
PATRICK WOLFF: Everyone who knows Deep Blue is going to
win,
raise your hand? Oh, no faith."
MIKE VALVO: What's this?
PATRICK WOLFF: No faith in the world champion!
MIKE VALVO: How many think Garry is going to win?
PATRICK WOLFF: It could be a draw. How many think a draw?
MAURICE ASHLEY: A lot of hopefuls. A lot of Garry Kasparov
fans
in the audience. I know I saw your hands rooting for Kasparov
at the beginning of the game. Now you switched around.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: You were talking earlier about the possibility
of bringing -- white bringing the queen up to b6.
MAURICE ASHLEY: Yes. A-ha. And we have seen a move. We
will
get to that question in a moment. We have seen the move Bxd6.
Kasparov is slowly returning to the board and we can certainly
expect Bxd6 by Kasparov. And we will not have to wait long, I
suppose, for Deep Blue's next move. It spent quite a bit of
time getting itself ready to play this move Bxd6. It has now
done so, and we are anticipating the big move, Qb6, penetrating
into the position. That would be the most advanced white piece
to date. You don't want the queen sniffing around in your
position.
MIKE VALVO: Ha-ha-ha.
MAURICE ASHLEY: Dangerous.
Real-time text commentary is made possible by LiveNote, Inc.
and Vincent Varallo
Associates