Three-piece burrs
For the simplest of all burrs, there exists no regular solution. The first part
will show why. The second part will show how people have overcome the problem
by relaxing some of the constraints to construct non-regular three-piece burrs.
Regular three-piece burrs
For regular three piece burrs we are looking at rods of the size 2*2*6. We use
the more common length of 6 in preference over the minimal size 4. Since the
core of a three piece burr is 8
(Lemma 4.1.1),
there are potentially 28=256
possible rods. By excluding disjoint and duplicate rods there are exactly
28 unique ones, of which 9 are notchable. A list of all the pieces can be
found on the Three-piece burr pieces page.
Not all of those rods could actually
be used in the construction of a regular three-piece burr.
| Lemma 1.1.1.2:
|
The solid rod may not be used in the construction of a regular
three-piece burr.
Proof: Using a solid rod would leave the other two rods disjoint.
|
| Theorem 1.1.1.3:
|
There is no solvable regular three-piece burr.
Proof: After the first two pieces have been assembled, there
is no way left to slide the third one in.
|
Non-regular three-piece burrs
While there are no regular three piece burrs, there are, however, a few
solutions to a non-regular three-piece burr. Some of these designs are
described in the following sections.
Segerblom's three-piece burr
|
In April 1899, Scientific American published a puzzle, designed by
Wilhelm Segerblom of Wakefield, Massachusetts. This design is also
described in "Puzzles Old & New", p.66
[Slocum86],
and in the "Book of Ingenious & Diabolical Puzzles", p. 73
[Slocum94].
All three pieces are identical. There exists only one solution
since the pieces and their mirror images are identical.
To assemble, all three pieces have to be slid together
in a diagonal movement. It is not possible to put two pieces
together and then slide the third one in.
|
Improved Segerblom three-piece burr
| The "Book of Ingenious & Diabolical Puzzles" mentions an
improved version of the Segerblom design
[Slocum94].
The picture in the book is too unclear to give an exact design.
However, it looks as if the
improvement consist in the addition of a
triangular section to improve stability, but without filling
the center completely. My best guess is a design as shown in the
figure to the right.
|
|
Wyatt's three-piece burr
|
Edwin Wyatt, describes in his booklet "Puzzles in Wood" a version
which requires a piece which can be rotated to make room to slide
the other two pieces together
[Wyatt28].
This design relaxes the constraint that rods can only have notches in
multiples of 1*1*1 cubes. One of the rods has a notch leaving only a
cylindrical part around which the piece can be rotated.
Since piece #3 has a mirror image of itself, there are two
possible solutions to this design. They are mirror images of each other.
|
Nob Yashigahara's fake three-piece burr
|
Nob Yashigahara invented this three-piece burr which is made
up of only two pieces!
[Slocum94, p.72].
The design relaxes the constraint of square rods by taking two
rods of size 2*4*6 and cutting them as shown in the following figure.
|
|
 |
If you make the two rods from three kinds of woods, it will be hard
to tell that this is not a three-piece burr, but just looks like one.
|
|






|